Ruby has a ping
in the Standard Library, but it's not a very good one. I really think it should be replaced, and there are a couple of options. Let me tell you what's wrong with the current ping
. Then I'll lay out a plan for replacing it.
First, it's in the wrong place. Instead of being nestled in with net/http
, net/smtp
, and the rest of the net friends, ping
is off in its own little world. This could be fixed if it weren't for a bigger problem.
Second, ping
isn't even an implementation of the real (ICMP) ping. It only does TCP pings (by default on the echo port). And it's not called in a standard way. The documents recommend the following:
rb(main):001:0> require 'ping'
=> true
irb(main):002:0> Ping.pingecho("localhost")
=> true
irb(main):003:0>
There are timeout and service parameter, but no number of ping attempts and you only get back a boolean value.
We can do better than that. In fact, we already have. There are at least three implementations of ping floating around that could be merged to provide a sensible interface; the full range of TCP, UDP, and ICMP pings; and could live happily in net/ping
. Is that too much to ask?
UPDATE: I wrote this on Friday, intending to post it this morning. In the meantime, Peter Szinek posted a message to ruby-talk asking if there were any way to get ping stats from Ruby. This is exactly the kind of functionality that we need to include in netping. I guess I was being more timely than I thought.
3 comments:
Pat,
Did anyone ever do something about it? Just curious.
Thanks
Vish
donnoit@yahoo.com
Slowly. I've merged Daniel Berger's implementation and mine. I need to add a bunch more documentation, then I think it will be in shape to submit a patch to the ruby-core mailing list.
I've got a bunch of other stuff on my plate, but I hope to do it this year (before 1.8.6 is more than a twinkle in matz's eye.)
So did anything happen with this? Is your code anywhere available? Did you add the ability to do a continuous ping and get the stats of the roundtrip times for each itteration (that is what I'm looking for)
Thanks!
Rob
Post a Comment